Hope for the Christian Church Through Global Incarnational Partnerships

Martine Audéoud & Rubin Pohor

Editor’s Note: This Cape Town 2010 Advance Paper was written by Martine Audéoud and Rubin Pohor as an overview of the topic to be discussed at the related session at the Cape Town Congress, ‘Hope for the Christian Church through Global Incarnational Partnerships’. Responses to this paper through the Lausanne Global Conversation were fed back to the authors and others to help shape their final presentations at the Congress.

Editor’s Note: 23 April 2019 – This paper has been edited to remove one case study example due to developments since the paper was first written. 

The Executive Director of Christian Direction in Montréal, Glenn Smith, wrote recently [1], ‘In the homes on my street, I can hear several different languages, symbolizing a diverse array of cultures. What was once a former European immigration has now shifted to a truly global movement’. If this global movement can be witnessed in our daily lives, especially in urban areas, it is all the more truly experienced in the Christian churches all around the world. After a few decades of experiences in global partnerships throughout the world, it is time to pause and reflect on the lessons learned from challenging or successful global partnerships, or both. The purpose of these reflections is first to go back to the Scriptures and dig out biblical principles that support the development of global partnerships within the Christian church. We will then reflect on refreshing examples of global partnerships. Finally, we will enquire about our new contextual parameters that should stimulate or suggest new creative models of partnerships in our global churches.

Biblical Examples of Global Partnerships

To ground biblically the concept of global partnerships, let us first open the Scriptures, where we discover the first global partnership in Eden. God, the Trinity, developed a global partnership with Adam and Eve, providing them with life and the most intimate relationship possible with himself. Adam and Eve were to protect and take care of the garden, and to bring joy to God’s heart within a loving relationship. What was global in this partnership? The whole created garden was to be taken care of, with all its contents. Its resources had to be managed. It became the means of sustaining Adam and Eve. From this first example we see that biblically-based partnerships are rooted in a 100% trusting, mutual, and intimate relationship that gives adequate security for an exchange of resources and services. This first global partnership aimed at satisfying the desire of God’s heart to share his unconditional life-giving love to creatures who would respond meaningfully.

A second global partnership can be found in Genesis 17, when God promises to Abraham descendants that would cover the whole earth in exchange for Abraham’s life of complete obedience and consecration to God. Again we can note how God is expecting an exclusive relationship with Abraham in exchange for a globalized abundance of life. At the heart of this partnership, we see God’s deep desire for a most intimate relationship with Abraham, his friend (Isaiah 41:8).

In Ephesians 3:14-21, we find another biblical example of global partnership. Here the apostle Paul pours out his heart regarding God’s trinitarian partnership with his worldwide church. The purpose of this partnership is obvious: the church was to be completely immersed in and filled with God’s love and his fullness. To accomplish this, God would empower the church with the Holy Spirit.

In each of these three examples of partnerships, what went wrong?  Trust broke down. Adam and Eve’s relationship with God suffered as they heeded the serpent’s voice. Abraham’s lack of trust resulted in pain for all humanity when he accepted his maid as a second wife instead of trusting in God’s promise and waiting for its fulfillment. In the third instance, Christ rebuked the church in Ephesus for abandoning its first love (Rev 2:4).

In view of the biblical roots of global partnerships for Christ’s church, a major component of these partnerships should be complete, unconditional trust and intimacy in relationships. Global relationships should not be sought because ‘we are living in a global world’, as is often said today, but because the church’s heart beats with God’s heart in yearning to pursue deep, intimate, trusting relationships with other parts of the church here on earth, thus prefiguring heaven when ‘God will be all in all’ (2 Cor 15:28). Secondly, the goal of global partnership is not resource management, sharing resources, or the like. This will generally happen in the development of global partnerships, but the primary motivation for global partnerships will be a heart filled with God’s trinitarian love towards another expression of Christ’s Body. Consequently, the sharing of resources does not have to be ‘equal’ or even ‘equitable’ in a global partnership. In the biblical models of global partnerships, resource sharing usually draws more heavily from one side of the partnership. One final principle is also obvious: in each of the three biblical examples, the goal of the partnership is that the recipient of the resources (ie Adam and Eve, the descendants of Abraham, or the church) would grow into a mature, loving relationship with God. As Cody Lorance wrote [2], ‘The active pursuit of ever-deepening global partnerships by local bodies of Christians enables those communities to better (and increasingly so) comprehend and know God’s love which results in dramatic spiritual transformation and growth’. Paul states that the end-goal of all the resource sharing that the trinitarian God exemplifies with the church is to enable the church to enter into the complete fullness of the consequences of Christ’s redemption at the cross (Eph 1:3-14). Thus, the pursuit of global partnerships that mirror the trinitarian God should aim to bring the church to a level of maturity where it will proactively and conscientiously seek to live in the light of the cosmological redemption that Christ has accomplished at the cross, and thus become a transformational agent in the diverse communities throughout the globe.

Contemporary Examples of Global Partnerships

Having looked at biblical and theological foundations of Christian global partnership, let us consider some creative and refreshing examples of partnerships that have been initiated throughout the globe. First, David Hacket [3] relates an Internet-based example of global partnership for glocal evangelism:

Because of the growing interest in reaching non-English speaking people on the Internet, a new effort is underway to create an international network of Web evangelism pioneers who work in languages other than English. Organizers are calling this anticipated network the ‘International Internet Evangelism Network’ or IIEN.

The purpose of the IIEN is to advance global Internet evangelism by creating a community of Internet evangelism practitioners who share what they learn, thereby avoiding duplication of efforts, and offer encouragement to each other. The forum can help practitioners discover ways to collaborate in similar ministries, with the hope of reducing expenses and increasing Christian unity.

. . . The Internet Evangelism Coalition (IEC) has long desired to assist online evangelism initiatives in languages other than English. However, its member organizations operate mostly in English.

At its September 2005 meeting, the IEC executive committee and VisionSynergy (www.visionsynergy.net) partnered to bring into being this international Internet evangelism network. According to Dr. Sterling Huston, chairman of the IEC executive committee, ‘The rapid growth, broad international reach and economical cost of the Internet offers individuals, churches and ministries an unprecedented opportunity to share the gospel of Jesus Christ worldwide. The IEC is enabling the church in fulfilling its mission by creating and communicating Internet resources for evangelizing our world. It has voted to establish a relationship with VisionSynergy and wants to help facilitate this initiative. The IEC is cooperating with VisionSynergy on this effort.’

In this excerpt we see that the purpose of IIEN is to advance the Gospel and to respond to the desire of God’s heart by creating a community and fostering unity. This corresponds very clearly to Christ’s prayer in John 17, whereby the world was going to know Christ and his love relationship with his Father, ie that the disciples would live in loving community with one another, and thus display to the world (here is the glocal effect) Christ’s love. Therefore, as community, collaboration and mutual encouragement are developed, and Christian unity is practiced and demonstrated to the world in the most powerful way.

Let us consider a second example of global partnership. After the most recent earthquake in Haiti and the immense losses experienced by the poorest country in the northern hemisphere, a desire to help sprang up from people, cities, churches and communities all over the world. A creative mission agency in the US, New Generation, seeing the need for encouragement, consolation, and uplift within the Haitian church and the Haitian communities, devised a plan. Acknowledging their lack of language facility and team preparation, they realized that a better option would be to find Francophone African Christians (in this case Ivorians) trained as counselors and who were willing to go to Haiti to encourage the church there. In that these trained counselors had more experience in dealing with challenging situations due to almost ten years of war and civil unrest in Côte d’Ivoire, the cultural shock would not be as great for them as it would be for American teams. They also spoke French and represented the ancestors of the African slaves deported to Haiti. Having heard of this plan, a small group of Ivorian ladies led by a school administrator decided to go to several schools that they knew, raising money for the counselors preparing to go to Haiti. Churches and several Ivorian Christian agencies are creatively organizing concerts and other events to encourage those who will be leaving for Haiti.

One of the major lessons that can be drawn from this example is that ‘global’ can also mean ‘historically global’. As representatives of those nations whose people were deported into slavery, this group of African Christians is actually remaking history by leaving their own people to serve willingly those that initially went to Haiti as slaves. Thus partnering globally also means rewriting history. Similarly, we now have mission agencies from Nigeria and several other African countries partnering to develop mission teams to go to serve in Europe and the US. As Oscar Muriu wrote for Urbana 2006 [4] while urging the churches to aim at maturity in global outreach, ‘the purpose of maturity is not independence, but interdependence’. Global partnerships will thus look at a shared vision triggered by divine love, creatively investing local and communal resources in order to serve interdependently each other’s communities.

Assets and Challenges for the Development of Global Partnerships

Let us now reflect on the specific characteristics of our twenty-first century world—its assets and challenges for the development of global partnerships to extend Christ’s kingdom on earth.

Some of our century’s assets undeniably reside in the development of cyberspace and how it can be used effectively to communicate, support, develop, and create an incredible variety of partnerships. Never in the world’s history has there been a capability to communicate efficiently worldwide as we see today. Since communication is one of the key components of effective partnerships, we are blessed if we can access these resources. However, statistics show that only 26.6% of the world has Internet access.[5] Since most of the global partnerships are based on Internet access, can we really talk about ‘global’ partnership if three quarters of the world do not have access to that kind of communication? Does ‘global’ mean ‘worldwide geographically’ or ‘access to global resources’ for the whole church? The areas where the church is exploding are those that have the least access to cyberspace, ie Latin America, Asia, and Africa. Therefore, how can we, in an honest and fair way, talk about global partnerships when the areas where Christianity is exploding are those that are the least covered by cyberspace access? How can and will the global church deal with this divide?

Secondly, global partnerships will need to take into account the increase in urban immigration.[6] For example, ‘Between 2000 and 2030, the urban population in Africa and Asia is set to double. Asia’s urban population will grow from 1.4 billion to 2.6 billion. Africa’s will surge to more than twice its size, from 294 million to 742 million. Latin America and the Caribbean will see its urban population rise from 394 million to 609 million. By 2030, 79 percent of the world’s urban dwellers will live in the developing world’s towns and cities. And Africa and Asia will account for almost seven in every ten urban inhabitants globally’ [7]. What will that mean for the development of global partnerships when reaching out for Christ to the whole world? Is the church equipped to think globally and ‘urbanly’ enough to develop ‘glurban’ partnerships that will address the challenges and the potential of the urban immigration movements in the coming years? How can the global church influence effectively the development of these global cities that are mainly situated in the economically more needy areas of the world?

Finally, we need to address an issue that Ralph D. Winter called ‘the largest stumbling block to leadership development in the global church’ [8]. In his paper, Winter noted the church’s traditional perspective on formal leadership training and appealed for a rethinking of church leadership training by broadening the access to theological education for church leaders without disconnecting them from their social communities and responsibilities. As Winter insisted, the global church needs to rethink its ways of approaching biblical and/or theological education. What global partnerships, for instance, would actually support the theological education of the African Initiated Churches? Would the global church be ready to disconnect from the world’s most recognized patterns of accreditation of theological education that are modeled after the secular? Is the global church willing to partner and take the time to create non-discriminatory opportunities for all church leaders, especially in the developing nations, to have access to theological education without removing them from their communities and sources of income? What kind of global partnerships could creatively address this concern?

There are many more assets and challenges that could be cited regarding the development of global Christian partnerships. One major fear in developing global Christian partnerships is that the movement may become another subtle way of ‘colonializing’ church movements in the developing world such that the power remains on the side of those who have the financial resources. Are church leaders from developed countries willing to give up their power and view the intellectual and spiritual assets of their developing countries counterparts as more important than the material resources that are available? Are church leaders from the developed countries willing to LISTEN to what the global leaders from the South are communicating? As we creatively assess our contributions to global partnerships worldwide, let us not forget that the measure of excellence in these partnerships is found in Philippians 4:8: ‘Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable – if anything is excellent or praiseworthy –think about such things’ and ultimately in Christ’s sacrifice at the cross to draw ALL men (humanity, ie all people groups and nations) to himself (John 12:32).

© The Lausanne Movement 2010

  1. Smith, Glenn (2010). Contextualization and God’s Global Mission. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://www.lausanneworldpulse.com/682?rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+lausanneworldpulse%2Flmah+%28Lausanne+World+Pulse%29
  2. Lorance, Cody (2010). Global Conversation: The Theological Impetus for Global Partnership.Retrieved on May 6, 2010 from http://www.tibm.org/the-theological-impetus-for-global-partnership
  3. Hacket, David. Casting a Globel Net. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://www.lausanneworldpulse.com/worldreports/60
  4. Muriu, Oscar (2006). The Global Church. Retrieved on Februray 12, 2010 from http://www.urbana.org/articles/the-global-church-urbana-06
  5. In 2009: 8.7% in Africa and 20.1% in Asia. Data retrieved on May 13, 2010 from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
  6. See for example the global urban migration maps at http://www.migrationinformation.org/datahub/gcmm.cfm.
  7. Data retrieved on May 13, 2010 from http://www.prb.org/Articles/2007/623Urbanization.aspx?p=1
  8. Ralph D. Winters. The Largest Stumbling Block to Leadership Development in the Global Church. Retrieved on May 13, 2010 from http://www.ijfm.org/PDFs_IJFM/20_3_PDFs/Access.pdf

Date: 29 Jul 2010

Grouping: Cape Town 2010 Advance Paper

Gathering: 2010 Cape Town


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *